Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther

WELCOME

As a philosophy professor, I investigate the promises and dangers of scientific theory. How do theories about consciousness and climate change influence technology, and how is that technology used, and abused? How are evolutionary and psychological theories used, perhaps illegitimately, to draw conclusions about race, sex/gender, and intelligence? When do we confuse and conflate literal and figurative maps with the world? I have lectured and published on a wide variety of topics in philosophy of science as well as on science more generally.

rgw@ucsc.edu

ACADEMIC CV (Updated June 12, 2014).

Here are my areas of interest: philosophy of science, philosophy of biology, philosophy of cartography, political philosophy, ethics, metaphysics and epistemology, philosophy of mind and cognitive science, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of the social sciences, Pragmatism, History of Philosophy of Science (HOPOS), Kant, post-structuralism, Latin American Philosophy.

1. Education and Appointments?

Stanford University: Department of Philosophy (B.A., Masters)

Indiana University: Department of Biology (Masters); Department of History and Philosophy of Science (PhD); Department of Mathematics (Minor)

University of California, Santa Cruz: Associate Professor; Department of Philosophy (2007 - Current)

UNAM, Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas (2003-2007)

Niels Bohr Institute: Center for the Philosophy of Nature and Science Studies; Center for Models of Life (Guest Researcher, 2009-2011).

2. Professional Service?

"History and Philosophy of Biology" Book Series Editor, Pickering & Chatto Publishers (London)

"Genomics and Philosophy of Race: Philosophy in a Multicultural Context" Research Cluster (UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UC San Diego, UC Santa Cruz, Stanford University, University of San Francisco), Principal Investigator.

Editorial Board, Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution

Reviewer for 20+ journals.

3. General research content?

Abstraction-Reification

What is the relation between the concrete (e.g., reality, material technology, and the body) and the abstract (e.g., theory, functional design, and consciousness)?

When and how do we universalize, essentialize, and ontologize our scientific abstraction? (William James called this "vicious abstractionism")

Pluralism

Which categories of scientific research exist in a plurality of ways?

(a) styles of scientific research

(b) theories and models

4. Current specific projects?

+Pragmatic aspects of models and modeling:

(i) mathematical models (especially in genomics, climate studies, and physics)

(ii) diagrammatic models (especially of biological mechanisms, and "Tree of life" vs. "Network of life")

(iii) narrative models (especially in Evo-Devo)

+ Assumption Archaeology of the practices, theories, and ontologies of these fields:

(i) the genomics of "race" (Wir sind alle Afrikaner)

(ii) network science

(iii) consciousness studies

+ Prediction and hypothesis testing (frequentist & Bayesian) as stringent and probative empirical methodologies

5. Other intellectual interests? Physics, psychology, literature and poetry, art, architecture, and the study of multiculturalism.

6. Languages? I speak Danish, English, and Spanish. Perhaps one day my French, German, and Latin will improve.

7. Other personal webpages?

RGW on philpapers

RGW on Google Scholar

RGW on academia.edu

Check out the rest of my webpage, if you are interested. Please send me your feedback.

En beskrivelse af min forskning (2007, på dansk)

The Quote Bestiary

"[The scientist] therefore must appear to the systematic epistemologist as a type of unscrupulous opportunist: he appears as realist insofar as he seeks to describe a world independent of the acts of perception; as idealist insofar as he looks upon the concepts and theories as the free inventions of the human spirit (not logically derivable from what is empirically given); as positivist insofar as he considers his concepts and theories justified only to the extent to which they furnish a logical representation of relations among sensory experiences. He may even appear as a Platonist or Pythagorean insofar as he considers the viewpoint of logical simplicity as an indispensable and effective tool of his research."

(A. Einstein,1949, "Reply to Criticisms" in Albert Einstein. Philosopher-Scientist (Library of Living Philosophers), p. 684)

"The problem for science is to understand the proper domain of explanation of each abstraction rather than become its prisoner."

(R. Levins and R. Lewontin, 2006,The Dialectical Biologist, p. 150)

"[E]xperience has taught me that the history of various forms of rationality is sometimes more effective in unsettling our certitudes and dogmatism than is abstract criticism."

(M. Foucault, 1979, "Omnes et Singulatim: Towards a Criticism of 'Political Reason'".)